Record 01
Inventory is treated as an operating file.
Websites, subdomains, documents, forms, mobile surfaces, and vendor-managed public-service systems are named before findings are treated as priorities.
Scope before claims
Deadline notice
DOJ Title II web and mobile accessibility compliance dates are now April 26, 2027 for public entities serving 50,000+ people and April 26, 2028 for smaller entities and special district governments.Rule summaryTitle II file
PublicProof public operating record
PublicProof is the Title II operating record before April 26, 2027.
For counties and cities serving 50,000+ residents, PublicProof turns public websites, PDFs, forms, mobile surfaces, vendor systems, findings, remediation, exceptions, and evidence into one human-reviewed operating record.
Initial ICP
County or city, 50,000+ residents
Deadline
April 26, 2027
Review posture
Evidence before legal and procurement review
Operating record anatomy
PublicProof is memorable because the record is visible before the sales conversation.
The site now makes the operating-record idea inspectable: every major buyer question maps to a record, owner, boundary, or evidence artifact.
Record 02
Findings stay deterministic and reviewable.
WCAG references, severity posture, service criticality, owner path, and evidence need remain traceable to the underlying records.
No AI authority
Record 03
Remediation work has owners and vendor paths.
Internal queues, vendor blockers, verification criteria, due dates, and renewal pressure live in the same record instead of separate spreadsheets.
Owner chain visible
Record 04
Evidence is prepared as the cadence runs.
The operating record can become a forwardable packet for ADA, legal, CIO, procurement, administrators, and department owners.
Review file ready
Buyer contrast
From scanner output to a public-agency review file.
This is the contrast that matters for a government buyer. PublicProof is not selling a prettier issue count. It is selling a way to keep scope, owners, vendors, unresolved work, and evidence together before the deadline compresses decisions.
Scanner exports and disconnected tickets
Issues leave the accessibility team, but ownership, vendor dependency, document workflow, and evidence posture stay scattered.
One maintained inventory-to-evidence record
A public entity can review what is in scope, what was found, who owns it, what is blocked, and what evidence is ready.
Human-reviewed and deterministic
AI may assist internal drafting, but PublicProof does not let AI make final findings, severity, exceptions, or evidence decisions.
90-day pilot
A bounded baseline that leaves the buyer with records, not promises.
The first engagement should create a decision file that a public entity can circulate. It should not force a buyer to infer the program from a demo.
Pilot file
What the baseline establishes
- Surface inventory across websites, documents, forms, mobile surfaces, and vendor systems.
- Findings register with deterministic WCAG mapping and service-criticality context.
- Internal and vendor remediation ownership path with verification criteria.
- Evidence pack for leadership, legal, ADA, CIO, procurement, and department-owner review.
Boundary file
What the record does not claim
PublicProof outputs support review. They do not certify ADA compliance, replace legal judgment, or turn AI and scanner output into final public-sector decisions.
Inspect sample packetTrust file
Procurement and legal reviewers get named boundaries instead of vague assurance.
The trust surface is part of the product story: limited collection, human review, AI limits, accessibility posture, and procurement routes are explicit before scope expands.
Scope
Bounded before work begins
The entity, surfaces, vendors, document workflow, and evidence objectives are defined before a pilot expands.
Procurement path
Data
Limited to operating records
PublicProof centers public surfaces, business contacts, vendor records, findings, remediation tasks, and evidence records.
No broad intake
AI
Internal drafting only
AI may organize and draft internally, but final conclusions, exceptions, and evidence issuance stay controlled.
No AI authority