Scope
Scope covered
Which websites, PDFs, forms, mobile surfaces, and vendor systems were included?
No ambiguous audit boundary
Packet sample
Evidence packet sample
A sample evidence packet a county administrator could forward.
This illustrative pack shows the operating record a county or city should be able to review after a bounded PublicProof pilot: scope, findings, remediation ownership, vendor dependencies, exception inputs, and next-quarter priorities.
Artifact type
Illustrative evidence pack
Audience
ADA, legal, CIO, procurement, administrators
Boundary
Not a certificate and not legal advice
Illustrative evidence pack
Q2 Title II Digital Accessibility Evidence Pack
County baselineHuman reviewedNot legal advice
Scope covered
Primary website, agenda packet repository, permit intake form, payment portal, and three vendor-managed services.
Findings summary
86 open WCAG findings, 12 high-service-criticality issues, and 4 vendor-owned blockers with due dates.
Remediation progress
42 tasks opened, 19 resolved or verified, 11 in review, and 3 blocked by vendor milestones.
Exceptions and limitations
Exception candidates remain review inputs only; PublicProof does not issue final legal determinations.
Vendor dependencies
Payment, forms, and agenda vendors tracked with contact path, next milestone, and renewal escalation date.
Next-quarter priorities
Close service-critical forms, remediate recurring PDF templates, and obtain dated vendor commitments.
Pack contents
The evidence pack is an operating index, not a certificate.
Each section answers a review question and ties the answer back to scope, owner, vendor, or next-quarter work.
Findings
Findings summary
Which WCAG issues remain open, which are service-critical, and who owns them?
Signal over noise
Tasks
Remediation progress
What has been assigned, fixed, verified, blocked, or deferred?
Operating queue
Vendors
Vendor dependencies
Which risks depend on third-party platforms or contract follow-up?
Procurement input
Exceptions
Exceptions and limitations
Which items need formal review before they can be treated as exceptions?
Not closure
Next
Next-quarter priorities
What should the entity do next to reduce service-critical risk?
Cadence
Important boundaries
The sample is forwardable because its limits travel with it.
The sample is useful because its limits are explicit. The same boundary discipline applies to a real pilot evidence pack.
Boundary
This document does not reflect a real public entity and does not constitute legal advice, compliance certification, or a final accessibility determination.
AI boundary
AI may support internal drafting and summarization, but final findings, severity, exceptions, and evidence issuance remain deterministic and human-reviewed.
Forward for review
The artifact is designed for review teams that need the same scope, progress, and boundary language.
Do not treat as certification
A real engagement still requires scoped review, entity validation, and public-sector legal judgment.